Among the lessons of World War II, perhaps no other lesson has been accepted as the most important lesson than this: you can never appease an aggressor. Indeed, entire foreign policy and military texts have been created around this premise because it is so important and central to handling an aggressor. For 80 years we have known this. It was a grave error of World War I that we attempted to appease an aggressor. As a result came World War II. Unfortunately, today's MAGA Republicans haven't learned this and they happen to hold office in the Executive branch of the U.S. government, in addition to the Congress. They have tried to paint the aggressor, Russia, as the victim, even though Russia clearly attacked Ukraine without provocation. There can be no appeasing Russia; that lesson is clear. To do so only prolongs the conflict, as any subsequent months or years of apparent peace will later prove to have been anything but peaceful, but rather the opportunity for a nearly-expired Russian military to rearm, reorganize, retrain and recruit more soldiers for a second, more sophisticated attack on Ukraine or another neighboring country. If the appeasement happens, Russia will decide when they want to attack again and they won't be restrained by prior agreements, not even agreements that have favored them.
We should hold no illusions that Trump or any other Republican in power today will suddenly decide to read a bit of history and learn what foreign policy and military experts have known for 80 years. However, we should hold them accountable for the delayed consequences that any appeasement will certainly bring. As the Nixon administration's strategic ambiguity on Taiwan has now come home to roost, an appeasement of Russia will bring consequences much more severe and realized much sooner than Nixon's strategic ambiguity. China, Russia and the rest of the international community have observed Republicans in the last several decades brag about the deceiptful use of the English language that defined U.S. policy on Taiwan by leaving it confusingly unclear, thanks to a confusingly unclear use of English. That in itself has become a selling point to China and Russia that they're better off together, united against the USA. If Trump thinks separating them is more important than maintaining alliances, it only illustrates how wrong strategic ambiguity was that Republicans have grown to idolize the policy and the President who devised it so much as to believe that repeating it, no matter how temporary the outcome, is so important that it's worth abandoning allies to them. Whether or not Republicans are trying to repeat the Nixon goal of separating China and Russia, they no doubt realize it would be beneficial. However, appeasement isn't the answer.
If you take nothing else away from the Trump administration's attempts to create "peace" between Ukraine and Russia, it should be this: through angry and repetitive delivery, Trump has repeatedly tried to paint his own cowardly, simpleton decisions as genious and strong and it has repeatedly caused grave harm to the United States of America and its allies. Europe and Ukraine will suffer the greatest consequences of appeasing Russian aggression, but it will also negatively impact the USA. Whether Trump and the Republicans think they are going to separate Russia and China or they just want to stop spending money to keep a safe and free world, it's the most supremely foolish geopolitical folly that has been attempted in the last 100 years. Those who believe in the lie that Donald Trump is intelligent because he can coerce Ukraine to submit to Russian demands and achieve a few months or a few years without active war should read a bit of history from the second World War. Appeasement guarantees that this conflict will last much, much longer, albeit with an intermission. The saddest part of all of this is the fear-peddling Trump engages in to promote appeasement. While it's difficult to count the number of times he has sought to instill a fear of nuclear war and World War III into Americans, it emphasizes the cowardice that is so core to his being and his decisions that he wants all Americans to share in it.